Schrödinger’s Secession Petition and The Governance of Grievance: Alberta Premier’s Scorched Earth Appeal

Alberta Premier Danielle Smith isn’t just playing politics; she’s engaging in a scorched-earth PR strategy. By appealing the court’s decision on a fraudulent secession referendum, Smith is sacrificing Treaty rights and judicial integrity to fundraise off grievance. It’s a cynical shakedown that trades Alberta’s – and Canada’s – long-term stability for a short-term base loyalty boost.

I am flabbergasted. Flabbergasted!

It’s the only word that fits. What the hell is Danielle Smith doing? Is she auditioning for the “Alberta Brexit Award for Self-Imposed Sovereignty Suicide?” Because that’s the trajectory. We aren’t just off the rails; we’re off the mountain and into the abandoned oil well.

I get the politics. I really do. You have to toss red meat to the base to keep the hounds from snapping at your own heels. We’ve all seen the inner-party blowback. But appealing a court decision that quashed a referendum built on a foundation of criminality? That isn’t just “playing to the base.” That’s a scorched earth policy. She isn’t just playing with fire; she’s dousing the fire station in high-octane gasoline and handing out blowtorches to the most radicalized elements of her caucus. It’s reckless. It’s cynical. It’s offensive. But then again, that is the Smith brand.

She’s trying to frame the judiciary as “anti-democratic” while her entire petition is propped up by a data heist. It’s peak hypocrisy. It’s Schrödinger’s Petition: she claims to oppose the tactics while using the full legislative and financial weight of the province to defend the results.

She’s trying to be Everything Everywhere All at Once, but she lacks the charm, the whimsy, and the general “cool factor” required to pull off that kind of multiversal chaos.

Instead, Alberta is left with a Premier who treats Treaty rights – the literal bedrock of our constitutional democracy – as a bureaucratic nuisance. These aren’t just suggestions written on parchment; they are the title deeds to the land we stand on. But Smith doesn’t care about foundations. She’s busy courting a narrow, nativist, bigoted bloc, and she’s doing it with eyes wide open.

I’ve said it before: If you sit at a table with ten people and one is a nazi, you’re sitting at a table with eleven nazis. If you spend your days pretending to be a bigot for electoral gain, the mask doesn’t matter – the face underneath has already rotted to match it. By framing Indigenous partners and the judiciary as “radicals” or “obstacles,” she isn’t “managing” the extremists. She’s doing their laundry.

Does she think she’ll win the appeal? It doesn’t matter. This isn’t a legal strategy; it’s a PR shakedown.

Whether she wins in a courtroom is irrelevant to the grift. As long as the process drags out, she can fundraise off the friction. She can campaign against “activist judges” and “Indigenous vetoes” while the province burns. She is using the legal system as a stage for a performance of grievance.

She’s radicalizing the base to shore up a throne that’s starting to wobble. She’s willing to trade the long-term stability of the province and the sanctity of our national constitutional relationships for a short-term bump in her donor list.

Danielle Smith would rather rule in hell than serve in heaven. She’s made her choice, but the rest of us are the ones forced to breathe the smoke.

I’m flabbergasted. This is total betrayal.


This can be heard on SpreakerSpotifyiHeartRadioAmazon Music, or other podcasting platforms.

Kvetch with Jon Liedtke is a podcast of all of my radio interviews, reporting, commentary, media interviews, and more!


RELATED POSTS


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *