610 CKTB | From Epstein-Files to X-Files: Decoding the Latest High-Profile Documents & Redaction Distraction


Gene Valaitis and Jon Liedtke discuss reports that the US government is preparing religious leaders for shocking UFO/UAP disclosures. They analyze the potential for these revelations to upend biblical beliefs, the political branding of “demonic” labels by JD Vance, and the possibility of suppressed “free energy” technology.


Transcript (Gemini Generated):

Gene Valaitis: I suggest you put your tin foil hats on and get ready for this story. Um, there’s something massive brewing south of the border. Influential pastors are claiming they have been told by the US government to prepare their followers for shocking revelations about UFOs which may upend their beliefs in the Bible. There is only one man who could cover this story, and he joins me this morning. Jon Liedtke, good morning, Jon.

Jon Liedtke: Good morning, Gene. I love sci-fi, so I couldn’t not pitch this one to you.

Gene Valaitis: Okay, well listen, I’ve got my aluminum foil hat on. Um, okay, let’s talk about first the distraction, and it does come from the Daily Mail. Um, gas continues to rise, the world’s on fire, and now suddenly a UFO report is about to be released? This is the ultimate political distraction, come on.

Jon Liedtke: Gene, we’re talking about an intergalactic space bomb being dropped right now. Whenever the price of premium hits the “take out a second mortgage” level, the US government starts looking at the stars. It’s a lot easier to start talking about little green men in the sky than about the little red numbers at the gas pump. This is the ultimate pivot. Why worry about check engine light on your aircraft destroyers when there’s an unidentified submersible that’s a dolphin kamikaze off the coast?

Gene Valaitis: You know, you know, it—the timing of this is kind of interesting too. Um, Barack Obama, who by the way is in Toronto tomorrow night giving a speech, he was on with Colbert last night and Colbert asked him about aliens, and he didn’t really answer the question. Hmm. Now, um, of course there’s going to be a demonic angle to this because you have to have one of those. In the article, the Daily Mail says pastors are being told these things are demonic, and it may change everyone’s belief in what is written in the Bible. Hmm, what’s going on?

Jon Liedtke: We’ve officially moved from X-Files to The Exorcist now. When the tech is so far beyond our comprehension and we can’t explain it with physics, we start explaining it with Sunday school. Calling it demonic is just a way for people to categorize the unknown without having to admit that we’re not the smartest guys in the room. It turns out a national security problem can also be a spiritual one, and that might actually be, honestly, cheaper to buy than holy water. But is it easier to buy or build than a hypersonic interceptor?

Gene Valaitis: True. Um, JD Vance is getting in on this. Uh, he’s calling them “spiritual demons.” Now, um, I’m just wondering, is he worried about a great deception or is this just a way to ensure the 2028 evangelical Christian vote from the Southern US?

Jon Liedtke: Yeah, JD is not just checking the radar. He is checking the 2028 primary polls. By calling them spiritual demons, he’s speaking a specific dialect of evangelical Christian—he’s a Catholic himself. He’s trying to create this new hybrid model, bringing everyone together, it seems. He’s building a bridge, though, from the tin foil hat crowd and the pew crowd, and it’s brilliant, but it’s terrifying, but it’s branding. He’s not worried about a great deception from space; he’s worried about a great rejection at the ballot box. If you can frame things like this, Gene, as a demon, you don’t need a Space Force. You just need a candidate with traditional values to lead a crusade.

Gene Valaitis: Okay, so if there’s real tech, like free energy, would the government of the United States under Trump disclose it?

Jon Liedtke: I—I don’t think—one, it would exist that a secret could be held that big. But free energy, I mean, we’re talking about the ultimate economic kill switch. If DARPA has a box that can power a city for the price of a AA battery, they’re going to bury it under ten miles of concrete, I suppose, because you don’t just hand out free energy in a petrodollar world. You either crash your stock market like that, but we’re talking about something here that is apparently being disclosed. It’s being held from us, and the government will soon be telling us about these aliens “quote-unquote” long before they tell us anything about how to stop paying this always-increasing gas bill.

Gene Valaitis: Well, you know, I get back to Obama and, you know, the—the quote is just coming back to me while we’re talking. Um, he told Colbert last night that the government is way too disorganized to hide aliens, and I think he’s got a point.

Jon Liedtke: Yeah, Obama is playing the “incompetence card,” and it’s a classic one for him because he’s such a good explainer-in-chief, the way that he was. It’s the idea that a government—if they can’t fix a pothole in Windsor or Niagara, do you think that they can actually hide a flying saucer in Nevada? But the thing is that governments are not monoliths; they’re just a collection of silos. And silos are filled with people, and you don’t need the whole government to hide an alien; you just need three guys in a windowless room at the Pentagon to do so that can, you know, maybe just be walked off to another room and never seen again if it gets too bad. But Obama’s “too disorganized” line about it is the perfect “nothing to see here.” It’s the most sophisticated way of saying “don’t worry your heads about this thing.”

Gene Valaitis: Mm. So was Obama lying last night when he said that?

Jon Liedtke: It was such an interesting thing to watch him have to do the political reaction after he did the immediate reaction, and that added so much to it because I don’t know, even if he was just being lighthearted, you can’t be lighthearted about this kind of stuff. Um, so, I don’t know. I think we’re probably going to find something out. I think it might be very, very revelatory, such as, “Hey, aliens exist, but we found like microbes on a comet and it was 70 years ago and nothing happened to it, and while that’s a huge deal, it won’t really affect anyone’s lives. We’re not going to get better technology by it, and we’ll just get back to another issue and Iran soon enough.”

Gene Valaitis: Yeah, of course, yeah. Um, you know, I remember about a year and a half ago, there was testimony in Washington, and they had all these highly trained US Air Force pilots and they were even showing video of items that were in front of them in an airplane and suddenly vanishing and going away. And it wasn’t just one report; there were almost a dozen with a dozen different aviators from the Air Force, and nobody could explain what they were. It’s interesting—I forget the phrase. They don’t call them UFOs anymore, but…

Jon Liedtke: UAPs.

Gene Valaitis: Yeah, UAPs, yeah. And even here in Ottawa, we learned last year that they’re setting up a special investigative branch in the Canadian government to study UFOs and if they really exist. I don’t know, what do you think? Is there anything there?

Jon Liedtke: I think that the likelihood that other space life exists out there is highly probable. I mean, we’re talking, you know, Fermi’s Folly here. Um, but I just—I wonder if it’s going to be as revelatory as big as anything beyond space mold, for example. But, you know, this is just—it’s all to me, it’s so important and it’s so exciting, and I just hope that it doesn’t become another distraction that people forget about soon, like, you know, JFK file disclosures, JFK file disclosures, Epstein file redactions—all of them were covered in so much black ink. I think that this is what we’re probably going to see. But out of, you know, setting up offices to investigate that here on our side of the border? Yes, please. You and I need good content, Gene.

Gene Valaitis: Yes, we do. Uh, and speaking of of what you just referenced, I see where a judge in New York has opened up some more files with respect to Jeffrey Epstein, and they have released what they are claiming is a suicide note that Epstein wrote shortly before his suspicious—to say the least—death. And uh, if you go on any major publications, you can see it. Terrible handwriting, and basically he said, “You know, it’s over. I’m fed up.” Now, whether they can prove he actually wrote it and if it’s actually from him is another thing completely. But again, you want to talk about keeping your tin foil hat on, you know, suddenly now we have a suicide note from Jeffrey Epstein.

Jon Liedtke: Yeah, and what did it end with? “Not fun, not worth it”?

Gene Valaitis: Yeah, that’s right.

Jon Liedtke: That’s the funniest part of a suicide note that I think you could possibly put in from a guy who allegedly ran—I don’t have to say allegedly—a guy who ran an international sex trafficking ring, um, with a—a pedophile one. So, you know, “not worth it, not fun”? No kidding, guy!

Gene Valaitis: No kidding is right. Oh, you’re a classic this morning, Jon. Thank you so much for this story, and uh, we’ll be watching for the aliens.

Jon Liedtke: Oh, so will I. Looking up. Thanks, Gene.

Gene Valaitis: Jon Liedtke, always has a great take on these stories. Um, I don’t know about the Daily Mail. You read so much crap in that newspaper, um, but this—this one just really kind of caught my attention and Jon’s as well.


This aired on 610 CKTB
Follow Gene on Twitter or LinkedIn



RELATED POSTS


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *